To do so, we analyse a city-wide network of urban farming actions which form one set of nature-based solutions interventions-the Taipei Garden City Project in Taiwan. Taking nature-based solutions, and in particular urban farming, as a point of departure, the purpose of this paper is, therefore, to explore how academic, policy and practice actors compete and cooperate to make claims of expertise in shaping a vision for a sustainable city through green spaces. Yet amidst this enthusiasm, there remains a need for more attention to how place context shapes urban transitions in specific localities (Wolfram and Frantzeskaki 2016) and to critically interrogate how different knowledge systems compete to shape the governance and deployment of urban sustainability initiatives across space (Hughes et al. Broader initiatives such as the Edmonton Declaration ( 2018) encourage measures such as the creation of chief scientist positions within cities. Similarly, international agenda-setting organisations such as ICLEI ( 2017), Future Earth (Future Earth Urban 2019) and the Biophilic Cities Network ( 2020) increasingly advocate science–policy–practice coalitions and public participation in support of upscaling and learning both within and between cities. This field of enquiry is supported by concomitant interest in the politics of how knowledge and expertise drive the implementation of urban sustainability interventions (Frantzeskaki et al. There is significant global interest in how innovation and experimentation in neighbourhood-level nature-based solutions may enable sustainability transitions in cities (Dennis et al. Nonetheless, we also question the extent to which embodied and experiential knowledge is sufficient to support environmentally and socially appropriate outcomes for attaining urban sustainability. This study argues that in-between spaces and actors, who can cut across different fora, are vital to make urban farming interventions happen. This allows long-term public–private partnership to be developed and enables different knowledges and experiences to co-exist in policies and practices. The result shows that the science–policy–practice community was formed in a dynamic ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ process. The aim of this paper is to understand how different actors and knowledges come together to form a science–policy–practice community for a citywide urban farming initiative-Taipei Garden City. Yet it is also recognised that the policy and implementation of this nature-based strategy is influenced by an underlying science–policy–practice community. There is growing interest globally in the potential of urban farming to respond to a breadth of urban sustainability challenges.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |